Direct comparisons
Every comparison here answers one decision: which tool the dated evidence favors for each shared job. Matrices are evidence-dated, claim sources are named, and support claims gated on other products' releases stay marked pending until verified.
2026-08-29 · Evidence 2026-08-29 · 8 min read
A direct, evidence-dated decision for teams putting coding agents on shared work: six per-job verdicts comparing a Kanban board's human planning surface with an execution ledger's dependency, evidence, concurrency, and audit semantics, verified live against the released YYLO Ledger CLI and its committed README on 2026-08-29, with this route's zero-demand dataset gap stated openly.
2026-08-28 · Evidence 2026-08-28 · 8 min read
A dated shortlist of open-source coding-agent tools picked layer by layer — open weights, coding agents, coordination, evaluation — where every inclusion passed four re-runnable checks against public sources on 2026-08-28 and every famous omission is explained.
2026-08-28 · Evidence 2026-08-28 · 9 min read
The terminal-first field map of coding-agent CLIs — Cursor CLI, Kiro CLI, Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Crush, Amazon Q CLI, the community Grok CLI, Factory's Droid, and YYLO — scored across install surface, orchestration, task truth, evidence, and portability, with every cell dated 2026-08-28.
2026-08-28 · Evidence 2026-08-28 · 9 min read
The one canonical, evidence-dated matrix comparing Cursor, Kiro, OpenCode, Pi, Claude Code, Codex, and YYLO: surface, model choice, repo-traveling instructions, durable records, fan-out, landing, license, and evaluation — with split verdicts stated plainly and uncovered combinations marked as gaps.
2026-08-28 · Evidence 2026-08-28 · 8 min read
A direct, evidence-dated YYLO versus Conductor comparison: parallel workspaces built on the same Git primitive, automated merge admission against a human review pass, records that live in the repository versus the app, and cloud microVMs against local execution — per-job verdicts with the route's own demand stated as estimates.
2026-08-28 · Evidence 2026-08-28 · 7 min read
A direct, evidence-dated YYLO versus Cursor comparison: per-job verdicts across IDE editing, parallel agents, task truth, merge admission, automation, and portability, with the both-tools combination and the exact limits of the demand data stated openly.
2026-08-28 · Evidence 2026-08-30 · 8 min read
A direct, evidence-dated YYLO versus Kiro comparison: per-job verdicts across spec-driven planning, durable task truth, dependent-work sequencing, parallel runs, merge admission, and a dispatch seam verified absent from released product truth, with the exact limits of the demand data stated openly.
2026-08-28 · Evidence 2026-08-30 · 8 min read
A direct, evidence-dated YYLO versus OpenCode comparison: per-job verdicts across readable source, model plumbing, durable task truth, merge admission, parallel sessions, and a dispatch seam verified absent from released product truth, with the exact limits of the demand data stated openly.
2026-08-28 · Evidence 2026-08-28 · 7 min read
A direct, evidence-dated YYLO versus Pi comparison: per-job verdicts separating a minimal terminal agent harness from the control plane above it — session trees, model switching, landing records, fan-out, and a dispatch seam that already runs in both directions — with the route's zero-row demand gap stated openly.
